Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 13:02
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Why can’t my wife just accept the fact that I’m going to cheat?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Texas public health departments brace for another $119 million in federal cuts - The Texas Tribune
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What we know about Trump's latest travel ban - BBC
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What are some questions obviously just asked for sexual gratification?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Marines in LA as ICE protests spread to more U.S. cities: In photos - Axios
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Chinese-Owned Company Halts Work on Factory to Make Batteries in U.S. - WSJ
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.